Thursday 23 February 2017

'Fifty Shades Darker' Review



Christian Grey (Jamie Dornan) looks to draw Anastasia Steele (Dakota Johnson) back into his life but the only way he'll return to him is if there is a new arrangement in their relationship. As the two rebuild their relationship, former figures from Christian's life come into play, creating new problems.



Film is a very subjective media platform. What may be a film that I love may be one that someone else despises and vice versa. At times it may be hard to understand why someone likes or dislikes a film but with their opinion, you can maybe see their point of view. With '50 Shades Darker', I cannot understand why anybody could like this garbage and there's nothing anybody could at to change my opinion.


To start off, I know that I am 100% not in the targeted demographic for this film, I knew that from the start and was only confirmed when I was only 1 of 3 men in the screening. Due to this, many may say "well it isn't meant for you" or "you shouldn't have seen it then". These statements although slightly true - I really shouldn't have wasted my time with this atrocity - does not make the film immune from standard criticism. Unfortunately for the film, it deserves a whole lot of criticism as it is the worst film released in 2017 so far.


It's been made a common knowledge fact that the 'Fifty Shades' book series started off as 'Twilight' fan fiction and as been criticised for poor writing. It would seem that the ultimate downfall of the film is within its screenplay, bringing terrible, cringey dialogue as well as a terrible narrative. For 'Fifty Shades Darker', Niall Leonard - the husband of the original author of the book - takes over to bring one of the worst and poorly constructed scripts you may ever see. The film follows a formula of the lead character Anastasia telling Christian to not do something, then proceeds to have Christian to do that very thing and then for the two to argue, make up and then have sex. At first, you don't realise the laziness but after the 5th or 6th time, you start to realise that this is all the film is. What makes it worse is that the dialogue is so unrealistic that you can't imagine anyone actually speaking like that. It doesn't seem authentic at all, making it hard for you to take seriously. For events other than that formula, there are some very odd moments that feel extremely out of place. For the most part, this includes a former beau of Christian's who seems to be stalking Anastasia but there is a moment late on surrounding a helicopter crash that is one of the oddest moments I have ever seen in a film. I don't know what went on in Leonard's, author E.L James' or the studio's heads when a decision was made to include this in the film as it is one of the mot stupid scenes in a movie. It has absolutely no purpose, it has no setup and it has no payoff. It's was a total waste of time and only hurt the film even more, although that didn't seem possible.


What makes the film even more unbearable is how terrible these characters are in the film. Everyone with any focus on them is just an awful person and none more so than Christian Grey. The character is a pretty awful person and is so especially to Anastasia, the one he supposedly loves. You can have flawed characters for sure but Grey is awful in all aspects and when he is the protagonist and I guess a "good guy", it's almost impossible to root for him or want to like him at all. I guess that it shows that you can be good looking and people will still adore you no matter you do. Dakota Johnson's character Anastasia seems to be a fairly clever person but it doesn't make sense to why she's with Christian. The film constantly shows him going against what she says and there's no reason for him to stay, the only thing is that he's good looking. And is this really the kind of message that you want to send out to a female dominated audience? Is this the ideal situation for those looking for a lover? Johnson's performance as Anastasia is incredibly boring as she shows very little range throughout the whole movie, with her character not doing much at all of interest in the film. Anastasia is one of the worst female characters in Film history and the fact that more people are going to see this female-led film over others is an absolute travesty.




Of course, the main draw of these films is the sexual nature and action. Due to this, you'd expect it to be something extraordinary but it really isn't. It isn't sexy, it's just awkward. There isn't really anything that is done that is exceptional or much different to anything seen before. When your film I based on a gimmick or offers something like this and ultimately, it fails to deliver, then you have a clear problem. It's like if a comedy wasn't funny or if a horror wasn't creepy or scary, you'd be disappointed with what you got. Due to this, I cannot see why this is enough of a draw for many people but I guess its just the sort of fantasies many people have. If that's the fact, I couldn't imagine a more awkward experience in a cinema.


I really don't understand how anyone could possibly think this is an adequate film. There are problems all over the board and most of them have to do with the writing in the film. The performances are uninspiring with the actors being very disposable. I didn't expect much from 'Fifty Shades Darker' and I got even less from it. One of the worst film I have ever seen and it'll take something special to overtake this film as the worst of the year.


Final Verdict =


So have you seen 'Fifty Shades Darker'? If so, what did you think of the film? I hope that this review was useful for if you were planning on seeing the film or not! Once again, thank you for taking the time to read my review, it is much appreciated!


By Angus McGregor

Tuesday 21 February 2017

2017 Oscar Predictions!


The 89th Academy Awards are just around the corner and on Sunday night, the Academy will reward some of the best films of the year on a glamorous stage. Like every year, many people are giving their thoughts and predictions for who will walk alway with some of Film's biggest prizes. For the second year running, my friends and I will be competing yet again to see who can get the most predictions right. Joining me again this year are Michael, Drew and last year's winner, Billy. We will be giving our picks on the main categories as we haven't seen the likes of the documentaries or short films. Now lets get onto the predictions!


We will be running through and talking briefly about thoughts considering some of the picks. We won't do this for every category but there will be a table at the end with the full list of our predictions.



Best Supporting Actor


Nominees: Lucas Hedges (Manchester By The Sea), Dev Patel (Lion), Jeff Bridges (Hell Or High Water), Mahershala Ali (Moonlight), Michael Shannon (Nocturnal Animals)


My Pick (Angus): Mahershala Ali (Moonlight)

Billy: Jeff Bridges (Hell Or High Water)

Drew: Lucas Hedges (Manchester By The Sea)

Michael: Dev Patel (Lion)

This category is the category I have most of a problem with. I was disappointed by the nominees in this list as I felt 2 of them should've been replaced with other actors in their respective films. I feel that Jeff Bridges and Michael Shannon should've been replaced by Ben Foster and Aaron Taylor-Johnson. The performance that I enjoyed the most was Lucas Hedges in 'Manchester By The Sea' but my pick goes to Mahershala Ali considering his recent success at the SAG and Critic's Choice Awards. As you can see from the predictions, it is a fairly open race with all four of us choosing different actors from one another.



Best Supporting Actress


Nominees: Viola Davis (Fences), Naomie Harris (Moonlight), Nicole Kidman (Lion), Octavia Spencer (Hidden Figures), Michelle Williams (Manchester By The Sea)


My Pick (Angus): Michelle Williams (Manchester By The Sea)

Billy: Octavia Spencer (Hidden Figures)

Drew: Viola Davis (Fences)

Michael: Viola Davis (Fences)

Again this was a very tough category to choose from as there was a great amount of talent on show. Octavia Spencer and Nicole Kidman were both great in their roles in their respective roles but for me, I felt that Viola Davis, Naomie Harris and Michelle Williams were just a level above them. For my decision, I let it come down to who was the most memorable and for me Michelle Williams stuck the most with me. The scene where she tries to patch things up with Casey Affleck is one of the best moments of the year and showcased her talent very well. Williams was fantastic throughout the whole film and is my choice for Best Supporting Actress.


Best Director


Nominees: Denis Villeneuve (Arrival), Mel Gibson (Hacksaw Ridge), Damien Chazelle (La La Land), Kenneth Lonergan (Manchester By The Sea), Barry Jenkins (Moonlight)

My Pick (Angus): Damien Chazelle (La La Land)

Billy: Damien Chazelle (La La Land)

Drew: Damien Chazelle (La La Land)

Michael: Damien Chazelle (La La Land)


As you can see, there seems to be a clear favourite within this category. Damien Chazelle should win the Oscar for Best Director as he created a marvellous and truly special film. The other directors in the category deserve to be in contention but Chazelle's work with 'La La Land' was above them. It is great to see Denis Villeneuve nominated for 'Arrival' nonetheless.



Best Actor


Nominees: Casey Affleck (Manchester By The Sea), Andrew Garfield (Hacksaw Ridge), Ryan Gosling (La La Land), Viggo Mortensen (Captain Fantastic), Denzel Washington (Fences)


My Pick (Angus): Denzel Washington (Fences)

Billy: Casey Affleck (Manchester By The Sea)

Drew: Casey Affleck (Manchester By The Sea)

Michael: Casey Affleck (Manchester By The Sea)


I would absolutely love it if Ryan Gosling were to win after he gave one of my favourite performances in 'La La Land'. However, I have no problem with any of these actors winning but there seems to be two frontrunners in the Best Actor race. I would have went with Casey Affleck but his chances of winning have went down since the Oscars have drawn closer. The last 12 winners of the SAG awards have gone onto win the Oscar the same year. Denzel Washington won the award this year which may indicate that he will pick up the Best Actor award on Sunday.



Best Actress


Nominees: Isabelle Huppert (Elle), Ruth Negga (Loving), Natalie Portman (Jackie), Emma Stone (La La Land), Meryl Streep (Florence Foster Jenkins)


My Pick (Angus): Emma Stone (La La Land)

Billy: Natalie Portman (Jackie)

Drew: Natalie Portman (Jackie)

Michael: Emma Stone (La La Land)


Again, this category seems to have two frontrunners with Natalie Portman and Emma Stone really standing out in this category. Amy Adams can feel hard done by as her exclusion is one of the biggest snubs, especially considering that Meryl Streep was nominated for 'Florence Foster Jenkins'. It is a close race but Emma Stone has been picking up awards along the way to the Oscars and I believe that the momentum is with her and that she will pick up the big prize.


Best Picture


Nominees: Arrival, Fences, Hacksaw Ridge, Hell Or High Water, Hidden Figures, La La Land, Lion, Manchester By The Sea, Moonlight


My Pick (Angus): La La Land

Billy: La La Land

Drew: La La Land

Michael: La La Land


First of all, there simply shouldn't be 9 nominees for a category, it should be kept to 5. Due to this, there are some films that have zero chance in winning this, despite being great in their own right. It's no surprise that we have all picked the frontrunner for Best Picture and I am glad to say that its my favourite out of all of the films in contention. 'La La Land' fully deserves the Best Picture award as I feel that it is the best film in the category.


The table below consists the rest of our predictions. For a full list of the nominees go to: http://oscar.go.com/news/nominations/oscar-nominations-2017-view-the-complete-list-of-nominees



Category
Angus
Billy
Drew
Michael
Best Picture
La La Land
La La Land
La La Land
La La Land
Best Actor
Denzel Washington (Fences)
Casey Affleck (Manchester By The Sea)
Casey Affleck (Manchester By The Sea)
Casey Affleck
(Manchester By The Sea)
Best Actress
Emma Stone (La La Land)
Natalie Portman (Jackie)
Natalie Portman (Jackie)
Emma Stone (La La Land)
Best Supporting Actor
Mahershala Ali (Moonlight)
Jeff Bridges (Hell or High Water)
Lucas Hedges
(Manchester By The Sea)
Dev Patel (Lion)
Best Supporting Actress
Michelle Williams (Manchester By The Sea)
Octavia Spencer (Hidden Figures)
Viola Davis (Fences)
Viola Davis (Fences)
Best Director
Damien Chazelle (La La Land)
Damien Chazelle (La La Land)

Damien Chazelle (La La Land)

Damien Chazelle (La La Land)
Best Animated Movie
Kubo and The Two Strings
Kubo and the Two Strings
Kubo and the Two Strings
Zootopia
Best Cinematography
Bradford Young (Arrival)
Linus Sandgren (La La Land)
Bradford Young (Arrival)
Linus Sandgren (La La Land)
Best Costume Design
Mary Zophres (La La Land)
Madeline Fontaine (Jackie)

Mary Zophres (La La Land)

Madeline Fontaine (Jackie)
Best Film Editing
John Gilbert (Hacksaw Ridge)
Joe Walker (Arrival)
Jake Roberts (Hell or High Water)
Tom Cross (La La Land)
Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Alessandro Bertolazzi, Giorgio Gregorini and Christopher Nelson (Suicide Squad)
Alessandro Bertolazzi, Giorgio Gregorini and Christopher Nelson (Suicide Squad)
Alessandro Bertolazzi, Giorgio Gregorini and Christopher Nelson (Suicide Squad)
Alessandro Bertolazzi, Giorgio Gregorini and Christopher Nelson (Suicide Squad)
Best Music (Original Score)
Justin Hurwitz (La La Land)
Justin Hurwitz (La La Land)
Justin Hurwitz (La La Land)
Justin Hurwitz (La La Land)
Best Music (Original Song)
Justin Hurwitz, Benj Pasek and Justin Paul: “City of Stars” (La La Land)

Justin Hurwitz, Benj Pasek and Justin Paul: "Audition (The Fools Who Dream)" (La La Land)
Justin Hurwitz, Benj Pasek and Justin Paul: “City of Stars” (La La Land)
Justin Hurwitz, Benj Pasek and Justin Paul: “City of Stars” (La La Land)
Best Production Design
Jess Gonchor and Nancy Haigh (Hail Caesar!)
David Wasco and Sandy Reynolds-Wasco (La La Land)
Patrice Vermette (Arrival)
David Wasco and Sandy Reynolds-Wasco (La La Land)
Best Visual Effects
Robert Legato, Dan Lemmon, Andrew R. Jones and Adam Valdez (The Jungle Book)
Stephane Ceretti, Richard Bluff, Vincent Cirelli and Paul Corbould (Doctor Strange)
Stephane Ceretti, Richard Bluff, Vincent Cirelli and Paul Corbould (Doctor Strange)
Robert Legato, Dan Lemmon, Andrew R. Jones and Adam Valdez  (The Jungle Book)
Best Writing (Adapted Screenplay)
August Wilson (Fences)
August Wilson (Fences)

Eric Heisserer (Arrival)

Barry Jenkins (Moonlight)
Best Writing (Original Screenplay)
Kenneth Lonergan (Manchester By The Sea)
Damien Chazelle (La La Land)

Taylor Sheridan (Hell or High Water)

Kenneth Lonergan (Manchester By The Sea)


So who do you feel has made the best predictions and is most likely to get the most correct? I’d also like to hear or you think will win at this years Oscars and also, who you feel was snubbed this year! Once again, thank you for taking the time to read my blog, it is much appreciated!

By Angus McGregor

Monday 20 February 2017

'John Wick: Chapter 2' Review



After carrying out brutal vengeance, John Wick (Keanu Reeves) returns to the quiet life of retirement until Italian gangster Santino D'Antonio (Riccardo Scamarcio) shows up at his home. D'Antonio wants Wick to return favours from the past and take out a target for him. Wick reluctantly obliges and becomes a target in the assassin world for a large sum of money. 



Keanu Reeves looked to have finally escaped that typecast character he had been associated with ever since 'Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure' with 2014's 'John Wick'. Three years later, Reeves is back alongside director and former stunt double Chad Stahelski to try and recreate the success of the first film in the series. The combination proved dividend as 'Chapter 2' can stand up next to the best action sequels of all time.


One of the main aspects that gained the first 'John Wick' a lot of praise is simply for how it filmed its action. The decision to focus more on stunts and choreography using wide angles was very successful in a time where fast cuts and shaky cam were dominating the action genre. Strangely, the film's main praise was that it simply showed you what was happening in the action which you would think was common sense. Instead, Stahelski put other action filmmakers to shame and he continues to do so in 'Chapter 2'. The films biggest strength yet again is the action work created between Stahelski, Reeves and countless stunt doubles and extras. The use of martial arts alongside weaponry is used to perfection, bringing sleek, stylistic, unique action to a genre where it is hard to continue to do something fresh. In ways that the 'Bourne' films inspired new techniques of action filmmaking, we can only hope that the 'John Wick' series has had the same effect.




What 'Chapter 2' succeeds well with is not create a complete carbon copy of the first film. It's been made pretty clear what the driving forces behind the first film were and with the trailers, many thought the same setup would've happened. However, the film continues to build upon the assassin world and with this, it brings a new story whilst still connected to the first film. There are enough new elements in this film that make it able to stand alone, unlike many others that really rely on what has happened in previous films. Stahelski's experience in the genre seems to have left a mark on him as he has seen first hand what can happen with action sequels. Thankfully, he learns from the mistakes others have made in the past and makes sure that he doesn't add to the list of awful sequels. 


What helps the film succeed is that the assassin underworld is very deep and interesting, leaving wanting you to see and learn more about it. Taking place alongside the present day, the world building is exceptional as Stahelski builds upon the Continental hotel with further services and ways that the assassins blend into everyday life. The settings in the film are perfectly suited to the film, creating magnificent looking areas to showcase the incredible action. The first film showcased a beautiful nightclub scene and 'Chapter 2' looks to match with some incredible scenes, including with the cleverly and masterfully down room of mirrors scene.




The tempo is kept fast paced for the most part with the final act delivering all across the board. The start of the film also establishes Wick exacting the final moments of his revenge, bringing the satisfying action early on. Between these points is where a lot more of the establishing of the story takes place which does slow the film down. This aspect is fine but the characters that we meet aren't overall improvements on the previous film. Ruby Rose' deaf character does bring something new and interesting to the story but the main villain D'Antonio isn't as great as Michael Nyqvist or even Alfie Allen's characters. There isn't as much hatred for these villains which just goes to show that there is no bigger crime in Film than killing a dog.


'John Wick: Chapter 2' is exactly what an action sequel should be like. If you're a fan of the genre then this is one that you should most definitely check out. Reeves is excellent as the titular character yet again but a whole lot of credit has to go to director Chad Stahelski. Stahelski puts most directors to shame and has a set a standard of action that everyone else has to match in this year of big money, action blockbusters.


Final Verdict = 


So have you seen 'John Wick: Chapter 2'? If so, what did you think of the film? I hope that this review was useful for if you were planning on seeing the film or not. Once again, thank you for taking the time to read my review, it is much appreciated!


By Angus McGregor